- Envy, competition and gender: theory, clinical applications and group work
- The Boy-Girl Blues: Dealing with Gender Disappointment | Parents
- The dangers of the “she’s just jealous” consolation
- Study examines gender differences in envy and jealousy in the workplace
- Search form
Those differences that still exist are expressions of agreements within society or personal partnerships about the division of labour between the sexes. Therefore, we have to look into another, unusual direction in order to understand why envy and malevolence as a foundation are sustained.
Only, what is this foundation now? It is evidently not about the advantages any longer that men have surreptitiously obtained at the expense of women. For the mostly female followers of gender ideology, this is rather about inner sensitivities, which can be captured as a psychological conflict.
Envy, competition and gender: theory, clinical applications and group work
This is nothing new, it is merely overlooked too often. Among genderists, this conflict leads to an essential division between men and women, which is considered to be immutable. They basically break down the men and women's world into opposites. Not in order to reconcile opposites, which alone would make sense, but to intensify them and to conjure women up as the saviours of history and humanity out of the magician's hat.
For them to be able to rise like Phoenix from the ashes of a wicked male history, men have to be vilified thoroughly. Let us single out the principal point from the bandwidth of such lines of arguments: violence is male. Men are violent, women, in contrast, are not. Yet, no evidence for this mythical - male violent being can be provided. In day-to-day life, countless anecdotes of wives standing with an iron frying pan behind the door are in opposition to this myth, and not to mention the findings of researchers.
The consequences of ignoring this reality is a poisoning of men and women's relationship and leads to an atmosphere of threatening hostility.
The Boy-Girl Blues: Dealing with Gender Disappointment | Parents
It is claimed that male violence was part of an unchangeable nature as much as amicability [iv] was of women's. This is all the more astounding as gender ideology has declared the influence of nature, such as biology or genetics, on human behaviour to be insignificant or, at best, marginal. The escape into an essentialist allocation of negative or positive features is due to one fact: the world is not polarised in a simplified manner, yet it ought to be declared as such.
The ideology of mighty men and powerless women is meant to do the trick so that political leverage persists to take state-financed gender-political against action evil men. Gender ideologues' practices of daily life are not disturbed by this inconsistency, although they are in stark contrast with their more subtly arguing precursors and representatives such as Simone de Beauvoir, Judith Butler and more generally with social constructivism.
These make the assumption that woman is not born as woman, but made into one.
Logically, this principle of socialisation should equally hold true for the man. If the male and female in its particular form are created socially indeed, then envy of men also has to be considered as a social construct and as ephemeral. This logical corollary is not pursued, because the second target would be missed: namely, to maintain the emotional certainty of envy and malevolence being justified. In the hostile tradition of certain branches of feminism, emotional needs and fantasies are being forged into one ideology. In the end, this resonates with the notion that masculinity and femininity are not only essentially distinct, but on top of that, unequal in worth.
The dangers of the “she’s just jealous” consolation
One gender is therefore worth more, the other rather less, that is inferior. From the point of view of gender ideology, masculinity is considered as enviable and femininity is not. Therefore, women have every reason to envy men on the basis of their anatomy and to endow them fancifully with characteristics such as magnificence and omnipotence; and they cover themselves with a veil of defectiveness and powerlessness.
Although genderists do not phrase it like this explicitly. They do so indirectly by portraying their own fate as the opposite of magnificence, thereby attaining yet again more reasons to establish envy and malevolence as a political strategy. As if there was no other way to achieve what is missing and desired. Men have indeed, such as the neurologist and electrotherapist J. They have done so with the intent of protecting the gender arrangement from a modernising dynamic.
Men feared for the pillars of their own self-certitude. While the women's movement of the last hundred years, trusting its own strength, has moved on from the debate of inferiority, the allegedly subversive gender ideology is reawakening this debate anew. Women are shown as weak and dependent on benevolent redeemers and providers. What is the driving force, which allows the genderists to cling onto the fiction of a woman's fate full of deprivation? Why are they ignoring the successes that women have achieved in competition and in society? Why are they valuing a woman's right to self-determination so little?
- Shaft Engineering: Conference Papers;
- Penis Envy and Other Bad Feelings | Columbia University Press.
- Reflection High-Energy Electron Diffraction and Reflection Electron Imaging of Surfaces.
- Profile Menu?
- Deals on Gender and Envy | Compare Prices & Shop Online | PriceCheck;
Such successes and merits have neither been given to women by men nor the welfare state. Why then do genderists cultivate the right to quotas and other undeserved advantages for women and girls instead of counting on their potential to succeed themselves? They cannot accept that women can be as autonomous and successful as men, even though they are surrounded by plenty of achieving women at the universities.
Autonomy and individualisation have no exceptional significance in their world-view. While he thought of benevolent yet patronising men, gender ideologues are hoping for the regulations of the welfare state. This encourages passivity, triggering a deep dissatisfaction and leading to a life without freedom. Additionally, it is a plea for supremely traditional relationship-arrangements, which many women - especially highly educated women - have left behind a long time ago. Wholly in contrast to the life of women envisioned as depressing, the life of all men is being imagined as pleasant, satisfactory and exhilarating.
And it is envied. As if men's lives were free from any burdens and sacrifices and day in, day out a single jamboree. If their work is perceived without its complexity and hardships, then this amounts to tunnel vision. And this is how we have encountered for about three decades in wide parts of society and especially the media a ritualised rhetoric, according to which all men are violent and all women are peaceful.
Their everyday life in their partnerships is broken down into irreconcilable antipodes as a consequence. It is not surprising that the state of being enamoured with victimhood cannot dissolve, making way for the transition to rational research within the humanities. The followers of gender ideology are, as I need to highlight here expressly, characterised more concisely by their psychological motives than their political ideas. They are plagued by what the psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud described as penis envy.
For this reason we can consider the anatomical difference as the main source for their stubborn state of being enamoured with victimhood.
- Envy and Malevolence - the Shaky Foundation of Gender Studies;
- People and Forests: Communities, Institutions, and Governance (Politics, Science, and the Environment)?
- How much we envy others — and what we envy — changes with age, study finds | MinnPost?
- My Desire for History: Essays in Gay, Community, and Labor History.
- The Atlas of Military History: An Around-the-World Survey of Warfare Through the Ages.
Not as an explanation for individual women, but as a model of analysis for the reasons behind the irreconcilability and the supposed lack of a future in relation to the male. As long as we cannot openly speak about this, we are upholding personal dissatisfactions that might exist. Furthermore, this alarming culture of bipolarity complicates the finding of a solution for conflicts - conflicts that have shaped the relationship between the sexes since the dawn of time.
Both genders become jealousy when they fear losing something or someone valuable to them. One study, however, revealed that women would be more likely to aim jealous behavior at a rival, rather than their partner. Maybe Hera was ahead of her time after all. One study published in the journal Evolution and Human Behavior found that taller men tend to be less jealous than shorter men.
Study examines gender differences in envy and jealousy in the workplace
The researchers attribute this to male height being associated with reproductive success, attractiveness and dominance. Similarly, women of average height tend to be less jealous than taller or shorter counterparts, perhaps because they are also believed to be healthier and more reproductively successful.
At this time, there does not appear to be a difference in jealousy levels between ethnic and age groups. Home Gardening International Subscriptions. Health Fitness International Subscriptions. Kids Girls. Would you like to rate and review this book? Add a Review Maybe Later. Gender and Envy. Nancy Burke. Be the first to write a review. Notify Me. Not in stock Click 'Notify Me' to get an email alert when this item becomes available.
Synopsis Product Details Delivery This collection brings together classic and developing psychoanalytic theory to examine gender and envy. The essays include foundational works by Freud, Klein, and Horney through to the current scholarship of Irigaray, Torok and Chasseguet-Simirgel. It aims to show how preoccupation with the Freudian concept of penis envy has both revealed and obscured fundamental psychological insights.
Let's Try No, Thanks. Select the List you'd like to categorise as, or add your own. Here you can mark if you have read this book, reading it or want to read. You added your first item into your Library. The fun begins.